- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
In re: OFP Matter for L.C.
March, 2020
Resolution:
Mr. Gempeler represented the petitioner for an Order for Protection against her sister, who was facing felony assault charges. Despite strong evidence to support these charges - and therefore, the OFP petition - the opposing party opposed the OFP and had legal counsel that she demanded push back at all costs. Thankfully, Mr. Gempeler saw through the bluster and strong tactical approaches from the opposing party and was able to negotiate an agreed-upon OFP with conditions that actually resulted in greater protection for the client than the Court would have imposed had there been a hearing. Avoiding the hearing - which would have required the client to testify - was paramount for a client with troubling medical issues and anxiety in testifying. She could not have been happier to retain Mr. Gempeler and the North Star team to fight on her behalf.
Types of Charge(s): Divorce/Family Law