- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
K.B. v. L.B.
February, 2026
Charges: OFP, HRO, and Harassment defense - civil setting
Resolution:
Our client was the subject of an Order for Protection ("OFP") action. The opposing party had previously filed two Harassment Restraining Orders ("HRO"), both of which were dismissed. Mr. Kehren immediately recognized that the legal system was being used to harass our client. He filed a frivolous litigant motion and a counter Petition for Harassment Restraining Order. On the day of trial, thanks to Mr. Kehren's strategic advocacy, our client’s HRO was granted, and the OFP matter against them was dismissed in its entirety. After enduring multiple legal actions and the stress of ongoing harassment, our client can now move forward with peace of mind. Another fantastic result for North Star Criminal Defense.
Types of Charge(s): Divorce/Family Law
State v. A.A.
February, 2026
Charges: Felony probation violation
Resolution:
This client, trying like hell to rise from a twenty-year pattern of addiction and convictions, received a complete removal of multiple felony drug counts and a gnarly probation violation matter, due to relentless advocacy on the part of North Star and Mr. Adkins. The client’s family has a man returning to them they’ve not seen in decades, due to his hard work, his mindfulness for sobriety, and his team of lawyers and staff. Remarkable results.
State v. S.A.
February, 2026
Charges: Domestic Assault by Strangulation - Felony; Domestic Assault - Misdemeanors
Resolution:
Plea to domestic assault by strangulation via Norgaard (i.e. too drunk to recall the facts) and received a gross misdemeanor sentence. Not only was the agreement with the State a departure to a gross misdemeanor, but it called for no time to be served and the minimum conditions while on probation. The client knew he made mistakes on the night in question, but could not afford a felony conviction. He completed some proactive steps to take accountability and Mr. Gempeler leveraged the few favorable facts to achieve this fantastic outcome.
In re: Confidential Attorney
February, 2026
Charges: Attorney Discipline Defense
Resolution:
North Star prides itself on being as full-service a defense firm as possible, and that includes the representation of attorneys (and judges) accused of misconduct by the Office of Lawyer Professional Responsibility. If you are an attorney looking for assistance with a client complaint, or accusations of misconduct or addictive issues threatening your practice, please call Messrs. Adkins and Kehren at North Star, and we can compare your matter to the multiple successful results we’ve obtained in the last fifteen years. If you desire to lodge a complaint against a legal professional, we may also be able to assist, and sometimes the best path doesn’t involve a complaint at all—fee arbitration, informal negotiations with a firm director, etc., may prove your best option. The professionals at North Star Law have you covered, just be sure to contact us first.
Types of Charge(s): Uncategorized
State v. D.O.C.
January, 2026
Charges: Misdemeanor assault and disorderly conduct
Resolution:
Continuance for dismissal on one count, full dismissal of another (worse!) count, minimal fine. This client was on a bit of a terrible roll, had a physical run-in with juveniles first, then a battle with his near neighbor, both cases far more complex than the usual misdemeanor asault and disorderly case. Mr. Adkins engaged a very thoughtful but generally conservative prosecutor, convinced said state agent that his client would confront his temper via a comprehensive anger management assessment, avoided treatment thereby, and obtained a life-affirming outcome.
State v. C.M.
January, 2026
Charges: 4 separate misdemeanor shoplifting cases (not charges, four separate cases)
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication to one misdemeanor case, while the other three cases are dismissed. The end result is a dismissal of all cases. On top of this ridiculously great outcome, the terms of probation are minimal - pay restitution, pay a small fine, and stay good for one year. Despite having a client who had no legal defenses available, Mr. Gempeler managed to obtain such an incredible outcome due to creative and savvy negotiations. Another fantastic result for a North Star client.
State v. C.P.
January, 2026
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Case dismissed. The reports, video, and even the submission by the school bus driver failed to satisfy whether or not the school bus stop arm was extended in full so as to permit the client to stop in a manner complaint with the law. Mr. Gempeler didn't bother with negotiations and pushed this matter to litigation expeditiously and successfully argued the lack of this key element to the Court. The matter was dismissed due to a lack of evidence. No matter how serious (or less serious) your case may be, we give each the respect it deserves and diligence required to advocate properly on your behalf. Another fantastic result for the North Star Criminal Defense team.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. B.S.
December, 2025
Charges: Domestic Assault - Misdemeanors
Resolution:
Continuance for Dismissal. Client was alleged to have physically assaulted his significant other on a public street after a night out. Cops were called to the scene, took statements, and photos of the alleged injuries. The client was also struck by the significant other, though, and had no prior record. With a career aspiration in a field that cannot afford a record, it was imperative to avoid a conviction. Mr. Gempeler and the North Star team achieved exactly that with the best possible plea deal - one that involves no admission to wrongdoing or a conviction. It's a dismissal after a year of good behavior. A rare outcome on domestic assault cases, but one that isn't as rare for the North Star team.
In re R.W.
December, 2025
Charges: Reckless Driving/Accident injuring a minor - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
In this Juvenile petition, Mr. Adkins connected the very young driver who, while distracted, struck a young pedestrian, who was fortunately not badly injured, with a program called Circles of Justice, and the case is now DISMISSED… after the State initially demanded a conviction and significant sanctions and challenges to the young client’s driving capacity. Restorative justice is mightily hard to obtain, unfortunately, in Minnesota Courts, and you will need a very creative and driven defender to access these lifesaving programs. North Star has a proven record of success, even in some instances where the State adamantly opposed the option to start. We get results, because we have wonderful clients who deserve our best work—and they get it.
State v. J.S.
December, 2025
Charges: First Degree Assault (down from Murder and Manslaughter), Felonies
Resolution:
Plea to a misdemeanor riot and fifth degree assault. Mr. Adkins may have outdone himself, here. This case concerned an all out melee, neighbors fighting with farm implements and (sharp!) garden tools, resulting in two deaths… but after nearly five years of wrangling, and a multitude of close calls on motions to dismiss, the case finally resolved as a misdemeanor riot, and fifth degree assault, with a plan for expungement after a very short term of probation. Complex jurisdictional arguments and a double jeopardy debate made this result achievable, but man alive, not predictable… and the client can return to his life without fear, without unreasonable sanctions, and with a new lease on life. Fantastic results.