- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
State v. L.M.
February, 2024
Charges: Possession of a Firearm by an Ineligible Person - Gross Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Case dismissed after legal arguments. The State tried to fit a square peg in a round hole with a "creative" charge that truly lacked facts and merit. Essentially, the client was charged as being a felon in possession, even though he was never convicted of a felony. The State, instead, asserted that a felony charge was sufficient to deem someone ineligible when the person received a gross misdemeanor sentence/conviction to said felony charge. The problem - the criminal statute required a felony conviction, which the client never had, by law. Mr. Gempeler and the North Star team raised a probable cause challenge. After a motion hearing in which the State made brief oral arguments, Mr. Gempeler submitted a lengthy brief arguing that there is no law that authorizes this charge. The City of Minneapolis immediately asked for a continuance to further assess its position and even brought in its in-house appellate team to research the arguments. After taking additional time, the City relented and dismissed, admitting defeat.
Types of Charge(s): Gross Misdemeanor