State v. M.S.

Despite strong opposition from the State, Dan secured a Stay of Imposition for a client facing multiple charges, an expanding list of alleged victims, and serious exposure to incarceration and restitution demands. The prosecution pushed aggressively for a Stay of Execution with significant penalties, but through strategic advocacy and the client’s genuine remorse, the court granted a more lenient resolution—one that avoided the most damaging consequences.

This outcome allowed the client to keep his business running, begin repaying damages, and continue supporting his family—a critical win that balanced accountability with stability. In a tough jurisdiction known for harsh prosecution, this case shows how thoughtful legal representation and a client’s commitment to change can lead to impactful, practical results.