Traffic Violations Case Results

To see just how successful our approach is, here are some representative results:

State v. A.P. / State v. M.M.

May, 2025
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violations - Misdemeanors (two separate cases)

Continuance for Dismissal. Two clients were charged with School Bus Stop Arm Violations each. After carefully reviewing the discovery materials, there were no defenses to either charge, as the crime was caught on squad video and the violation was clear as day. Mr. Gempeler was undeterred and strategically negotiated with the State by humanizing his clients and providing important context about the violations. The State relented and agreed to resolve both cases with Continuances for Dismissal. As long as the clients remain law-abiding for one year and pay the applicable fines, the charges will be dismissed. This resolution prevents criminal convictions and negative driving records, representing a significant victory for the clients.

State v. J.K.

April, 2025
Charges: Misdemeanor Driving Without a Valid License and Petty Misdemeanor Speeding Ticket

Continuance for Dismissal. At first, there was no offer on the table to resolve this case. But, with Mr. Hoppe's persistence, he secured the best outcome for the client under the circumstances. As long as the client stays law-abiding for a year and pays the applicable fine, the case will be dismissed. To avoid a criminal record, let along a traffic record, is fantastic for the client and yet another example of the talent this young man has under our watch.

State v. S.A.

February, 2025
Charges: Reckless Driving and Careless Driving - both misdemeanors; Excessive speeding of 100+ mph

Plea to a petty misdemeanor failing to drive with due care. The client was flying on 494 in his expensive sports car, going in excess of 110+ mph. The City added the serious criminal charges as a way to combat against such fast drivers. Add in the fact that a conviction to excessive speeding would result in a 6-month loss of license, the client was stressed about the possibility of a criminal record and losing his license. The North Star team fought back though, challenging the legal basis for the misdemeanor charges. With the hearing days away, we were then able to leverage it to reach a resolution that did not result in a loss of license or a criminal conviction. The client was floored, never expecting such a fantastic result. This is what we do, routinely.

State v. A.T.

January, 2025
Charges: Failing to stop after accident - Misdemeanor

Stay of adjudication. This outcome ensures the client will not be convicted of a crime following a traffic accident - an important result for the client. Additionally, this outcome should avoid a probation violation from a prior careless driving conviction. Two major wins for the client so he can move forward without a record.

State v. B.L.

December, 2024
Charges: Careless Driving and Leaving the Scene of an Accident - Misdemeanor Counts

Stay of adjudication to the leaving the scene count and the careless driving is dismissed. This was essentially a DWI, but he was not stopped at the time and not investigated into until the next morning - meaning they had no way of proving impairment. Still, it was a serious matter. Despite that, Mr. Gempeler worked hard on the prosecutor to achieve an outcome that results in a non-conviction - a truly remarkable outcome considering the severity of the incident.

State v. A.P.

November, 2024
Charges: Reckless Driving - Misdemeanor

Stay of adjudication. The client was driving on a gravel road and trying to do tail-whips. It did not go well, as he ended up in the ditch with two other passengers also in the car. Thankfully no injuries, but certainly a risky situation. The gravel road offered strong circumstantial proof of this driving misconduct. Undeterred, the North Star team negotiated this great outcome from a County Attorney's office notoriously difficult to deal with. Now, our client keeps his record crime free and won't have this negatively impact him (and his insurance, for instance) moving forward.

State v. S.R.

November, 2024
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Gross Misdemeanor

Stay of imposition plea to an amended misdemeanor count and only six-months' probation. What makes this such a great outcome is that it took 1.5 years' worth of pushing and negotiating to finally get a stubborn County Attorney to make this meaningful offer. In achieving this, the client avoids the six-month revocation and a nasty criminal record from a mere traffic offense. She was nearly crying, with a sense of relief that the long ordeal is finally over and in such a fantastic manner for her.

State v. L.C.

October, 2024
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Misdemeanor

Dismissed for lack of probable cause. The client drove past the school bus as the red lights were flashing and the stop arm was in the process of extending out. It was not fully extended. Due to this, Mr. Gempeler raised a creative and correct legal argument that the statute requires the stop arm to be fully extended, not in the process of it, in order for a person to be charged with this offense. After oral arguments, the judge agreed and dismissed the case. Another fantastic result due to the diligence and persistence of the North Star team.

State v. M.R.

August, 2024
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Gross Misdemeanor

Continuance for dismissal. This is an example of how persistence by Mr. Gempeler pays off. The initial offer was a plea to a misdemeanor offense, which is a great start because that ensures there is no loss of license stemming from the incident. Yet, it wasn't good enough. After rescheduling the hearing and showing up, Mr. Gempeler then got an offer to a stay of adjudication - a fantastic offer. But that was not sufficient for the client, given her line of work and consistent background checks. So, Mr. Gempeler finally got the prosecutor to offer this incredible outcome - one that is exceedingly rare for a gross misdemeanor offense.

State v. D.S.

August, 2024
Charges: Excessive Speeding - 100+ mph

Dismissed by the State during trial. This is a truly rare outcome. In the midst of a court trial, the State could not lay the proper foundation for the radar reading to be entered. The reason - Mr. Gempeler's dogged trial skills and objections completely flustered the prosecutor into having to dismiss the case. Understanding the nuances of the law - even for speeding tickets - Mr. Gempeler successfully stymied the prosecutor with the technical requirements in how to get radar readings entered into evidence. These nuances are so easily overlooked, to the detriment of defendants. Not with Mr. Gempeler and the North Star team. Even when a conviction seems not only likely, but a foregone conclusion, the North Star team gets to work and develops a strategy that can succeed. This outcome saved a client from a six-month revocation - a fantastic outcome, to say the least.

Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results