Misdemeanor

To see just how successful our approach is, here are some representative results:

State v. S.N.

September, 2019
Charges: Order for Protection Violation - Misdemeanor

Stay of Adjudication. Avoiding this domestic-related conviction was imperative for this individual to maintain his ability to work in the healthcare field. Despite not having much of a legal defense, Mr. Adkins was able to find a way to this tremendous result. Having terrific relationships with the prosecuting attorney and judge paid off when he was able to convince them that this rare outcome was both appropriate and necessary. The client is now in a position to avoid a conviction and maintain his career.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. C.S.

July, 2019
Charges: Indecent Exposure - Misdemeanor

Plea to an amended count of Disorderly Conduct. For a case involving public masturbation in a parked vehicle, avoiding an indecent exposure conviction - as well as any time in custody - was a critical result for the client. He is very pleased at this terrific result and knowing that a sex-crime type offense will not be on his record.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor, Sex Crimes

State v. S.E.

June, 2019
Charges: Misdemeanor School Stop-Arm Violation

Stay of adjudication. The state initially demanded a plea to the count as charged with a significant fine. After some negotiating, the state reduced its offer to a petty misdemeanor, which is a non-crime and not a bad outcome. Undeterred, the North Star team knew how to leverage a potential contested hearing into an outcome in which the client will earn a dismissal after the one-year probationary period on the stay of adjudication. And the fine remained the same as the original offer. Point being, the North Star team correctly navigated this case to get the client the best possible outcome to avoid creating a criminal record over a traffic matter.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. T.J.

June, 2019
Charges: Criminal Damage to Property - Misdemeanor

Stay of adjudication to an amended count of disorderly conduct. What makes this outcome even more remarkable is the client received the same outcome on a damn near identical incident less than a year prior to this incident. Still, with some proactive steps and savvy negotiating, the North Star team obtaining this outcome - even over the victim's objection to it. The client is thrilled to walk away from both incidents without a criminal record.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. S.S.

October, 2018
Charges: 5th Degree Assault - Misdemeanor

DISMISSED. Client was facing charges stemming from a fight in which he was wrongfully identified as the perpetrator. Instead, he was the peacemaker in a fight involving multiple individuals. Thankfully, Mr. Gempeler and the team at North Star diligently reviewed the witness statements and discovered that the State had charged the wrong individual based on the description of the perpetrators. With a photo of the client from the night in question, Mr. Gempeler easily persuaded the State to dismiss the case without even needing to file a formal motion.

Types of Charge(s): Assault Case Results, Misdemeanor

State v. J.L.

October, 2018
Charges: Indecent Exposure - Misdemeanor

Continuance for dismissal. For minimal costs and the only condition being to remain crime free, the client will keep a perfect record. For a young man, the prospect of facing this type of record with a conviction would be devastating to his future career. Yet, without any legal defenses, the North Star team still knew how to negotiate this critical outcome for our needful client.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor, Sex Crimes

State v. C.R.

July, 2018
Charges: Social Host Citation - Misdemeanor - St. Paul City Ordinance Violation

Dismissed by the prosecutor. Even though we received an incredible first offer for our client to complete a diversion program and the case would be dismissed. Ever diligent, Mr. Gempeler carefully reviewed the ordinance in play and the summary of the incident in the citation. In doing so, it was discovered that the State lacked facts to satisfy the definition of a key element to the charge. After raising this issue with the prosecutor, she agreed and dismissed the case. While this citation may not seem like much, to a client without a criminal record and was seeking employment in a highly competitive marketplace, it was critical to earn this outcome.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. E.V.

July, 2018
Charges: Misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct

Diversion resulting in a dismissal. Over the next six months, the client must complete some community service and pay a nominal fee. Upon his completion of that, the case will be dismissed. The client was facing the possibility of stalking charges. Yet, the careful and persistent negotiations by the North Star team led to a result that allows the client to keep his record clear.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. S.B.

April, 2018
Charges: Various traffic - Gross Misdemeanors

Dismissal and Count reduction. A client with several decades' worth of driving mishaps sought Mr. Adkins' assistance, after years with another lawyer, hoping to avoid a long local jail sentence. He didn't serve a DAY, and his matters are concluded with nothing more than a bit of community service to complete, and he achieved something he hasn't had in all that time--a valid driver's license. We will work tirelessly to put you to rights, with a license, or insurance, or the interlock, or therapies and counseling of a variety of descriptions, to get you onto your feet and avoiding further complications. No firm has more resources, or more energy, to assist you.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor

State v. M.W.

February, 2018
Charges: False Information to Police - Misdemeanor

Stay of adjudication. The City initially wanted a plea to the sole count of false info to police. This is common for this type of charge. But, the attorneys at North Star leveraged their strong relationship with the prosecuting attorneys and a sound negotiation strategy to land this needful result for a teacher. As a result of this outcome, the client will maintain a clear record.

Types of Charge(s): Misdemeanor