- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
United States v. (Confidential)
February, 2025
Charges: Federal/Tax Fraud
Resolution:
Our client, initially facing multiple federal charges tied to the unlawful receipt of over $10 million in tax refunds, has successfully avoided all original counts and the threat of mandatory federal prison time—a potential sentence that could have ranged from several years to nearly a decade. Thanks to the aggressive and strategic defense by James and Dan, he also will not be held financially responsible for any funds received by other defendants, shielding him from massive repayment demands for money he never touched.
While the case is still ongoing, the outcomes so far have allowed our client to move forward with his life, free from the most serious legal and financial consequences. This case highlights the power of retaining aggressive but creative legal counsel early, particularly when federal authorities are or may eventually be involved.
Types of Charge(s): Tax