- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
State v. T.C.
February, 2023
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Gross Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Continuance for dismissal. Even with the presence of children outside the bus, the North Star team (both Mr. Gempeler and Mr. Duffy) achieved this best possible plea negotiation. Usually, these are rare outcomes for a gross misdemeanor offense involving children. Thankfully, we knew how to approach the case, made a strong pitch, and, of course, our strong relationships with the prosecutors once again did not hurt our clients when we advocated on their behalf. What makes this outcome that much more important is that the client will be applying for naturalization in the coming year and this outcome will greatly reduce any impact this could have had on their application.
State v. D.H.
February, 2023
Charges: Indecent Exposure - 3 separate cases out of two different jurisdictions. One case included 3 counts of indecent exposure and 3 counts of disorderly conduct.
Resolution:
Plea to one charge of indecent exposure, the other two cases were dismissed, including the case which had six total charges. This young man was facing a gauntlet of trouble due to exhibition-type behavior. The North Star team had a challenge ahead of itself, but we properly balanced an aggressive and thoughtful approach to get this incredible outcome. Diligently researching some perhaps skeptical charges, the North Star team litigated one case and then leveraged it against the other two cases to put together a global resolution that at first seemed improbable. But, the improbable often becomes reality with the North Star team. With the global deal finalized, the client now only has one conviction and a sentence that is more than manageable for him to get back on his feet and moving forward. When both the judge and prosecutor acknowledge - on the record - how great of an outcome this was for the client, you know it's damn good.
State v. L.A.
January, 2023
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Misdemeanor (but should've been charged as a gross misdemeanor because kids were clearly outside the bus)
Resolution:
Continuance for dismissal. Video existed showing the incident and it was clear as day that the client rolled through the stop sign without stopping when there were kids just outside the bus. About as easy of a case to prove as you get. The North Star team was still able to negotiate this best possible plea deal, one that includes no admission of facts, no adjudication, and no conviction. The client will maintain her perfect record, which exactly what she sought when retaining this firm.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. C.V.
January, 2023
Charges: Ineligible Person in Possession of a Firearm; Intentionally Pointing a Firearm at Another; Felony Drug Possession - All felony counts
Resolution:
Dismissal. Client was facing multiple serious charges relating to guns and drugs. Bad combo, to say the least. Client was alleged to have been one of multiple juveniles in a car that drove around, pointed a gun at other kids, and had drugs in their possession at the time of their arrest. A client who had no prior record was caught up with the wrong crowd. The North Star team was diligent in its review of the evidence and research. And, we were persistent in pressing the State to get us all of the discovery after initial disclosures were incomplete. Eventually, it led to the discovery that the evidence pointed to our client being innocent. We filed a motion to dismiss the case. And in the weeks leading up to the hearing, the State came to realize - North Star was right. It dismissed the case prior to the hearing, knowing we were right. The family is thrilled that we brought the fight and got the just result.
State v. T.B.
January, 2023
Charges: Felony Intentional Discharge of a Firearm
Resolution:
Departure to a gross misdemeanor sentence, with no time to serve, over the State's objection. Client was charged with intentionally firing multiple rounds over a house in a neighborhood one morning. Multiple people were inside the residence at the time. Needless to say, very serious allegations with multiple "victims" - both inside the residence and neighborhood. Our client, though, was in the midst of a mental health breakdown and suffering from significant chemical dependency. Through North Star's guidance, he engaged in treatment, achieved sobriety, and entered counseling with his girlfriend. The last step was finding a judge who would be sympathetic to our arguments and efforts to get a non-felony outcome. After a few re-settings and finally getting the right judge, the North Star team submitted a strong argument and got the result the client wanted, in full - no felony and no jail. What seemed like a long-shot at the outset was realized thanks to North Star's team effort and smart advocacy.
Types of Charge(s): Felonies
State v. F.M.
January, 2023
Charges: Escape from Custody - Gross Misdemeanor; Probation Violation in separate DWI matter
Resolution:
Executed sentence on the underlying probation violation matter and a stay of execution with no additional time to serve on the Escape from Custody case. The client absconded from custody after not returning to jail from work release. He was on the run for a year before getting picked up on a new crime in a different county. This was also a second violation of his probation for the underlying DWI. In a county known for being unfriendly to defendants, the North Star team litigated this matter and worked hard on a strong sentencing argument in what was otherwise a lost case. The County Attorney requested an additional 90 days to be served on the Escape charge after the client was ordered to complete the full sentence of the DWI. After litigating the matter, the County Attorney then asked for a full year to be consecutive to the DWI sentence. Thankfully, Mr. Gempeler made a thoughtful and strong sentencing argument. And the Judge gave our client one final chance, ordering he receive a stay of execution (meaning NO JAIL (which was beyond even our expectations)) on the escape from custody case. The client and his wife are so happy they retained the North Star team to fight for them when they needed an advocate the most.
State v. A.P.
January, 2023
Charges: Two counts of misdemeanor domestic assault, two counts of misdemeanor assault, and one count of disorderly conduct
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication to one count of assault. Making this outcome even more remarkable is the fact that we avoided the requirement for domestic abuse programming that was recommended by probation in the pre-sentence investigation is usually imposed for any domestic assault case. The proactive steps - advised to be taken by the North Star team - proved to be the difference in both the negotiations and "sentencing." Now the client can keep his record conviction free thanks to this incredible result.
State v. A.D.
January, 2023
Charges: Driving After Suspension - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication. The client had a horrible traffic record, which even led to him being identified as a habitual violator by the State DVS. Under those circumstances, obtaining a plea that does not result in a conviction is rare. But, the North Star team pushed, advised the client on how to get valid, and was finally able to get this outcome, one that was absolutely needed for the client.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. J.L.
January, 2023
Charges: 3rd Degree Refusal - Gross Misdemeanor; 4th Degree DWI - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to a misdemeanor 4th degree DWI and dismissal of the more serious gross misdemeanor refusal charge. On top of getting the plea to a misdemeanor, the sentence called for no jail or community service, a minimal fine, and easy to follow terms of probation. The client had zero defenses and had a high PBT reading. Still, the North Star team achieved exactly what it and the client set out to with plea negotiations and was able to convince the prosecutor to come off his initial offer to the gross misdemeanor. Another satisfied client, thankful for the hard work and diligence by North Star.
State v. H.R.
January, 2023
Charges: 20 felony Counts of failing to file and failing to pay taxes, both individual and corporate
Resolution:
Stays of Imposition to 4 counts, no jail, minimal fine, and the only meaningful condition of probation was to comply with an audit, which we also ensured certain rights and arguments were preserved for the civil audit process. The client had a mess and faced the possibility of prison with these charges. Plus, when retained to replace a prior counsel - a notable tax defense attorney that had an undisclosed conflict of interest - the client instructed the North Star team that he was not going to trial, meaning our hands and leveraging ability were somewhat tied. Working closely with his civil tax attorney, we set out to achieve the best possible outcome and painstakingly negotiated an outcome that put him in the best position possible for the audit process. In the end, the client will be left with only misdemeanor convictions.