- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
State v. J.P.
June, 2024
Charges: Malicious Punishment of a Child - Felony Counts
Resolution:
Veterans Court Entry. In one of the signature victories this year, Mr. Adkins was able to convince the Veteran’s Court team to override a rule preventing these sorts of charges from participation. Client, who faced the loss of his home, his employment, and his veteran benefits, will exit that program with NO conviction, a clean record, sustained residence (back with his family, due to his exceptional commitment to treatment and sobriety), a promotion at work, and other massive benefits. No firm works harder for our veterans or active duty military, simply none. And none have the record of success we’ve obtained, and will continue to obtain. This is why we work.
Types of Charge(s): Felonies
State v. J.K.
June, 2024
Charges: Careless Driving - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Diversion that will result in a complete dismissal of the case without any admission or plea entered on the record. The client was fortunate to avoid a DWI based on the circumstances and instead only faced a careless driving. Even still, Mr. Gempeler and the North Star team successfully navigated the case, leaned on our great relationships with the local prosecutors, and secured this incredible outcome. Another fantastic result due to North Star's work.
State v. R.K.W.
June, 2024
Charges: 2nd Degree DWI - Gross Misdemeanor (2 counts); Obstruction of Legal Process & a separate Driving After Cancellation - Inimical to Public Safety (GM)
Resolution:
Plea to a single DWI count, dismiss remaining two counts of the DWI case (including the obstruction of legal process charge) AND dismiss the entire separate case for driving after cancellation - inimical to public safety. Not only that, but the sentence did not include a term of in-custody time, which is mandated by law. This is truly a phenomenal result and one that can only be achieved through the creative and aggressive negotiation skills from the North Star team.
Types of Charge(s): DWI Case Results, Gross Misdemeanor, Obstructing Legal Process Case Results, Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. S.L.
June, 2024
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI-Refusal - Gross Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to an amended count of careless driving. On top of this incredible outcome, the client has no jail to serve, no community service, a minimal fine, and essentially administrative probation for one year. The client was alleged to have refused the breath test, despite trying to provide an adequate sample. She suffered from asthma, which was exacerbated under high stress - such as being arrested for a DWI. Working with the client to get medical records verifying this, Mr. Gempeler was able to leverage this imperfect defense (imperfect because it is not recognized under the law) and the client's proactive steps to achieve this incredibly rare and fantastic outcome. A careless driving plea deal - without litigating - on a refusal charge is nearly unheard of. But these types of rare outcomes are commonplace when the North Star team is involved.
State v. L.H.
June, 2024
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI - Gross Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to a single count, no jail to serve, and a minimal term of probation. The client blew nearly triple the legal limit and got into a single-vehicle accident. Needless to say, difficult facts to overcome, especially with no real legal defense to try to leverage. The prosecutor initially offered time to be served in custody and a minimum of four-years probation. Through a strategic approach that used time to the advantage, Mr. Gempeler eventually obtained a plea negotiation that avoided jail, lowered the probationary period to two-years, and the remaining terms and conditions are very straight forward. Considering what he was up against, the client is very pleased with this outcome and avoiding what would have come had he chosen a different firm to represent him.
State v. B.F.
June, 2024
Charges: Speeding Ticket (Fifth in a 24-month period)
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication. What makes this outcome so impressive is that it is despite the fact that the client has a terrible driving record. This was his fifth traffic offense within a 24-month period. The significance behind that is that a conviction in this matter would have led to a 90-day license suspension. Typically, prosecutors are loathe to help someone in this position. Facing these tough facts, Mr. Gempeler pursued a creative and savvy plea negotiation that permits the client to avoid a conviction and the resultant license suspension. The client is ecstatic that he chose North Star to help him in his time of need.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. A.A.
May, 2024
Charges: 1st Degree Arson - Felony; Negligent Fires - Felony
Resolution:
Stay of Adjudication. Mr. Adkins convinced the State that, while it could hardly lose this negligent fire/arson case, the impact on the young lady’s life who was charged simply could not be justified. Our client will have a substantial restitution obligation, but no conviction, and can proceed with her studies and her life without this massive hurdle stuck in front of her. A massive win for the client and North Star team.
State v. W.T.
May, 2024
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI-Refusal - Gross Misdemeanor; 4th Degree DWI-Misdemeanor; Careless Driving - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to count 3, the misdemeanor careless driving, and the other two DWI counts were dismissed. Additionally, the client had no jail to serve and was placed on administrative probation. Even with a losing argument, the North Star team properly leveraged a motion hearing and witness availability issues for the State to get this utterly fantastic outcome. The client was uncooperative due to wanting to speak with an attorney - while a constitutional right, often, not at the times he was asking for the attorney. Despite the challenges it faced, the North Star team executed a savvy strategy and achieved the outcome the client needed.
State v. R.N.
May, 2024
Resolution:
Continuance for Dismissal. These citations may not appear to be the end of the world, and they aren’t… but they STING, if handled improperly or a driver simply eats the fine. Long term insurance and other ramifications are at stake, and Mr. Adkins was able to convince a leery prosecutor, who generally NEVER grants a continuance for dismissal, to provide just that leniency for a treasured North Star client.
State v. K.B.
May, 2024
Charges: 4th Degree DWI - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Dismissed. After carefully scrutinizing the discovery and, most importantly, the squad video, Mr. Gempeler detected that the Officer was clearly fishing for DWI's at a common happy hour destination and, as a result, the alleged basis for the stop was completely fabricated. Once this was brought to the State's attention, they reviewed it on their own and made the decision to dismiss the case - well in advance of the scheduled contested hearing. Such a result is atypical because, even in these types of instances, prosecutors will often just let the judge do the hard job of dismissing the case, rather than them doing the right thing. But Mr. Gempeler's advocacy and respect from his peers earned this outcome for a deserving client.
On top of that, Mr. Gempeler won the implied consent battle. But, he didn't just win it, his cross was so effective that the Attorney General handling the case dismissed the fight without even re-directing the officer. She knew there was no coming back from the cross and dismissed it outright in the middle of the hearing. This is literally unheard of. Even the Judge was caught off guard, commenting not only on the excellent cross, but also that she had never seen a dismissal mid-hearing like that.