- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
State v. W.F.
May, 2022
Charges: Carrying a pistol without a permit - Gross Misdemeanor; No Drivers License in Possession - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Continuance for dismissal to an amended count of driving after revocation with the gun charge dismissed as part of the amended complaint filed in advance of the agreement being finalized. The client was charged for driving with a handgun in his glove compartment. But, he was using his girlfriends vehicle and there was no evidence that he knew the gun was in the vehicle prior to using it. As a result, the knowledge element of the charge could not be satisfied and the State even agreed. Once the gun charge was dismissed, the agreement to suspend prosecution came together quickly. This outcome is much needed for the client, as the mere charge itself had caused lost job opportunities. Now, he will walk away without a conviction following an easy term of probation. The client is thrilled he hired the North Star team to fight for him against these bogus charges.
Types of Charge(s): Gross Misdemeanor
State v. N.P.
May, 2022
Charges: Four separate speeding tickets - all petty misdemeanors.
Resolution:
One conviction for speeding; another conviction for speeding, but one that will not end up on the client's driving record; one stay of adjudication; and one continuance for dismissal. The client clearly had a lead foot and picked up these four separate speeding tickets out of four separate jurisdictions in a close window of time. A conviction to all four would result in a loss of license. The North Star team set out to figure out a global resolution that would not lead to the license loss and minimize the record created. And through this effort, the client walks away with only ONE conviction on his traffic record. A remarkable outcome, to say the least.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. B.E.
May, 2022
Charges: Failing to drive with due care - misdemeanor
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication. The client was alleged to have caused an accident when she was looking down at her phone. Even with restitution needed for the victim, the North Star team was able to negotiate an outcome that avoids a long-lasting criminal conviction for an accident. The client is thrilled that she will not be followed by such a conviction.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. J.S.
May, 2022
Charges: First Degree Drug Crimes
Resolution:
This client, looking at upwards of 300 months for multiple probation and new cases, settled for a trip to Boot Camp, and a return to his home in roughly eight months, thanks to Mr. Adkins' compelling sentencing arguments and deep research by North Star. Our teamwork is nonpareil, and we are second to none on these types of matters, where all seems lost--the hustle and the creativity matter more, when others would cash in chips or quit the field. North Star just cares more.
State v. S.F.
May, 2022
Charges: School Bus Stop Arm Violation - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication, meaning the client will not have any conviction on his record. In a case in which there was no viable defense to the charge, the North Star team leaned on his great relationship with a local prosecutor and a smart approach about how to achieve this needed and just outcome. Now the client will not create a criminal record as a result of this traffic matter.
Types of Charge(s): Traffic Violations Case Results
State v. S.M.
April, 2022
Charges: Indecent Exposure - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Stay of adjudication. Client merely needs to stay good for one year and pay minimal prosecution costs to earn a complete dismissal of this serious charge. He was accused of masturbating in a parking lot. A witness saw him and identified him as the suspect. Needless to say, there was not a lot to work with for a possible defense. Even when faced with daunting facts and accusations, we were able to negotiate an outcome that not only leads to a dismissal once he successfully completes probation, but it also leads to a presumption to get this record expunged a year later. This was a priority to the client and one that we knew how to achieve with a thoughtful approach to negotiations. Another fantastic result.
State v. B.T.
April, 2022
Charges: Domestic Assault by Strangulation - Felony; Domestic Assault - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to an amended count of Threats of Violence as a gross misdemeanor. This was a remarkably unique outcome that ultimately satisfied all of the client's goals - no jail, minimal fine, and preserved his gun rights upon completion of probation. The client turned down a better plea deal to a misdemeanor assault (non-domestic), but was concerned with losing his gun rights for three years, which state law mandates even on non-domestic assault convictions. So, the North Star team got creative and figured out a resolution that accomplished exactly this. Despite facing serious domestic assault strangulation felony charges and a prior allegation against him, we were able to get a non-jail, non-felony outcome and saved his gun rights from the three-year prohibition. This proves, once again, that the North Star team takes the big picture approach and tailors the strategy to each clients needs. While this is a worse outcome than an offer previously received, it's the right and perfect outcome for this client, which is what matters most.
State v. R.N.
April, 2022
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI - Gross Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to an amended count to a misdemeanor 4th Degree DWI. This was a first-time offense with a high reading - .20. Usually when the reading is so high - .04 above the .16 threshold to make it a gross misdemeanor - obtaining a plea to a reduced misdemeanor DWI is very difficult. The North Star team capitalized on a unique issue that it raised (but would unlikely be successful as a legal challenge) to negotiate this outstanding outcome for the client. She is thrilled that her record now shows a misdemeanor outcome consistent with a true first-time DWI, which will be much more manageable for her explaining it away during background checks.
State v. D.H.
April, 2022
Charges: Order for Protection Violation (x2) - Misdemeanors
Resolution:
Case dismissed on the eve of trial. Typically, OFP violations are very challenging to fight because it often is straightforward to prove a violation. Contact is contact. But, in this case, the State was pushing a theory that simply did not add up to a violation based upon the use of the protected party's name in a website domain. Fighting this required a sophisticated knowledge of understanding the internet and how to create and publish websites - something the investigator and prosecutor did not possess. An expert helped solidify the defense and the North Star team applied the pressure as the trial date approached. Finally, the State realized it did not have a case and dismissed the case. Another fantastic result achieved due to North Star's fight and creativity.
State v. W.L.
April, 2022
Charges: Indecent Exposure - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Continuance for dismissal. Client was alleged to have exposed his privates while driving in a neighborhood. Despite the allegations, the North Star team developed a strong legal strategy around possible identity and then leveraged it, along with the client's good overall record, to negotiate this incredible result. As a result of our effort, the client will avoid any conviction, plea, or even acknowledgement of wrongdoing. He is thrilled with the outcome and avoiding a record that would have a long-lasting impact on his future.