- Home
- Criminal Defense
- Arson & Negligent Fires
- Assault
- Burglary
- Child Neglect
- Criminal Vehicular Operation
- Disorderly Conduct
- Domestic Assault
- Drug Crimes
- Federal Crimes
- Gun Rights Restoration
- Malicious Punishment of a Child
- Murder/Homicide
- Obstructing Legal Process
- Pre-Charge Representation
- Probation Violations
- Robbery
- Sex Crimes
- Sexual Assault
- Theft
- Threats of Violence
- Traffic Ticket Attorney
- Underage Drinking Crimes
- Weapons Charges
- White Collar Crimes
- Dwi Lawyers
- 1st Degree DWI Minnesota
- 2nd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 3rd Degree DWI Minnesota
- 4th Degree DWI Minnesota
- Implied Consent Law
- License Consequences
- License Plate Impoundment
- Limited License
- Bail & Conditional Release
- Mandatory Penalties
- DWI Defenses
- Minnesota DWI Laws
- Field Sobriety Tests
- Vehicle Forfeiture
- Ignition Interlock Device
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Law
- Case Results
- Assault Case Results
- Domestic Assault Case Results
- Drug Crime Case Results
- DWI Case Results
- Expungement Case Results
- Felonies
- Gross Misdemeanor
- Misdemeanor
- Obstructing Legal Process Case Results
- Sex Crimes
- Theft & Shoplifting Case Results
- Threats of Violence Case Results
- Traffic Violations Case Results
- About
- Blog
- Contact Us
State v. S.A.
February, 2025
Charges: Reckless Driving and Careless Driving - both misdemeanors; Excessive speeding of 100+ mph
Resolution:
Plea to a petty misdemeanor failing to drive with due care. The client was flying on 494 in his expensive sports car, going in excess of 110+ mph. The City added the serious criminal charges as a way to combat against such fast drivers. Add in the fact that a conviction to excessive speeding would result in a 6-month loss of license, the client was stressed about the possibility of a criminal record and losing his license. The North Star team fought back though, challenging the legal basis for the misdemeanor charges. With the hearing days away, we were then able to leverage it to reach a resolution that did not result in a loss of license or a criminal conviction. The client was floored, never expecting such a fantastic result. This is what we do, routinely.
State v. M.S.
February, 2025
Charges: Fraud/Theft by Swindle
Resolution:
Despite strong opposition from the State, Dan secured a Stay of Imposition for a client facing multiple charges, an expanding list of alleged victims, and serious exposure to incarceration and restitution demands. The prosecution pushed aggressively for a Stay of Execution with significant penalties, but through strategic advocacy and the client’s genuine remorse, the court granted a more lenient resolution—one that avoided the most damaging consequences.
This outcome allowed the client to keep his business running, begin repaying damages, and continue supporting his family—a critical win that balanced accountability with stability. In a tough jurisdiction known for harsh prosecution, this case shows how thoughtful legal representation and a client’s commitment to change can lead to impactful, practical results.
United States v. (Confidential)
February, 2025
Charges: Federal/Tax Fraud
Resolution:
Our client, initially facing multiple federal charges tied to the unlawful receipt of over $10 million in tax refunds, has successfully avoided all original counts and the threat of mandatory federal prison time—a potential sentence that could have ranged from several years to nearly a decade. Thanks to the aggressive and strategic defense by James and Dan, he also will not be held financially responsible for any funds received by other defendants, shielding him from massive repayment demands for money he never touched.
While the case is still ongoing, the outcomes so far have allowed our client to move forward with his life, free from the most serious legal and financial consequences. This case highlights the power of retaining aggressive but creative legal counsel early, particularly when federal authorities are or may eventually be involved.
Types of Charge(s): Tax
State v. J.P.S.
February, 2025
Charges: Solicitation of Prostitution
Resolution:
In a case that typically results in a full conviction and jail time, Dan Adkins secured a remarkable outcome: no jail time, no crushing fines, and a treatment-focused resolution that prioritized recovery over punishment. This so-called “John” case—often among the hardest to resolve favorably—took a different turn thanks to a compassionate prosecutor and Dan’s unwavering advocacy. Together, they crafted a plan centered on healing, not retribution, giving the client a realistic and supportive path forward through a carefully structured treatment program. At North Star Law Group, we believe accountability and recovery can go hand in hand—especially when the goal is lasting change.
Types of Charge(s): Sexual
State v. M.K.
February, 2025
Charges: 3rd Degree DWI - Gross Misdemeanor Counts
Resolution:
Plea to an amended misdemeanor count of DWI, with no time to serve, a fine, and easy terms of probation to follow. The client blew a .20 and had no legal defenses. On top of that, the city prosecutor is notoriously challenging to deal with on similar cases. Nonetheless, Mr. Gempeler leaned into the possible career implications in play and the client's proactive steps in order to negotiate this fantastic result. It was the exact outcome the client was hopeful for, but realistically did not expect. That's why you get the North Star team on your side - to get the unexpected.
State v. T.M.
January, 2025
Charges: 4th Degree DWI - Misdemeanors; Underage Drinking and Driving - Misdemeanor
Resolution:
Plea to an amended count of Careless Driving, with no time to serve, a minimal fine, and credit for the proactive steps taken leading up to the plea. The client was underage, blew a .10, and had no legal defenses with some not-so-great driving conduct to boot. Despite these troubling facts, he was accountable from the start in getting assessed and achieving sobriety. Mr. Gempeler was then able to leverage it all into a fantastic outcome where the conviction is non-alcohol related. Considering everything, the client and his family were very pleased with this outcome and his ability to move forward in a much more favorable manner than they initially feared.
State v. F.O.
January, 2025
Charges: Driving/Traffic Violations
Resolution:
In a case that seemed destined for jail time and license suspension, Dan Adkins—alongside James and Sean—secured a stay of adjudication, meaning no jail, no license suspension, and no conviction on the client’s record. This outcome protected the young man's dream of becoming a United States Marine—something that would have been derailed by even a short jail sentence or further damage to his driving record. Despite a long history of traffic violations and criminal issues, and initial predictions from other attorneys that the best possible outcome would still be damaging, the North Star team saw an opportunity for redemption. By working with a thoughtful prosecutor and presenting the client’s remorse and commitment to change, they persuaded a skeptical judge to give him a second chance. At North Star Law Group, we fight for results that change lives, not just cases.
State v. K.R.
January, 2025
Resolution:
Thanks to Dan Adkins’ advocacy, a young single mother avoided jail time, preserved her stable job, and received a reduced charge—downgraded to a misdemeanor—with the opportunity for early expungement in just one year. At the outset, she faced serious consequences stemming from alcohol dependency, including damaged relationships, injuries, and the destruction of valuable family heirlooms. Rather than rushing to a guilty plea or risking a damaging trial, Dan strategically delayed the case, giving her time to pursue treatment and demonstrate real progress. With compelling documentation of her sobriety, commitment, and personal growth, he convinced both the judge and the State to support a second chance. At North Star Law Group, we don’t just fight for results in court—we fight for your future.
State v. J.S.
January, 2025
Charges: Gross Misdemeanor Domestic Violence
Resolution:
A young man facing a serious charge—with the complaining witness demanding a year in jail and key evidence including video footage and seemingly incriminating statements—was up against long odds. These cases are typically unwinnable at trial, but Dan Adkins approached it with strategy, tenacity, and a deep dive into the facts. By scrutinizing the evidence and highlighting inconsistencies in the witness’s account, Dan was able to shift the narrative and open the door for negotiation. In the end, he secured a stay of adjudication—a result that meant no jail time, no conviction, and only minimal fines—allowing the client to keep his job, care for his child, and move forward with his life. At North Star Law Group, we bring this same level of dedication and creative problem-solving to every case we handle.
State v. J.S.
January, 2025
Charges: Explosive Devices/Threats of Violence
Resolution:
Dan succeeded in convincing the state to grant a Downward Durational motion, despite the State's strong objections. This decision means that a recent alarming incident involving a man claiming to be affiliated with Al Qaeda—who threatened to detonate a bomb in a populated urban area—has been categorized as a misdemeanor. This case was further complicated by new criminal activity occurring while Dan was diligently guiding the client through treatment efforts.
Thanks to the strategic advocacy of attorney Dan Adkins, our client has successfully avoided what could have been a much harsher consequence: a lifelong felony charge that would have brought extensive legal challenges and stigma. Instead, the client is facing only a short stint on work release and a minimal fine, a remarkable outcome in light of the serious accusations involved.
Types of Charge(s): Threats of Violence Case Results